Main Menu Home Just So You Know Logical Fallacies About Us A Brief Word On In-Depth Studies Study Links Study Topic Menu Foundations and Hermeneutics Redemption Dispensationalism Bible Cosmology The Church Ethic Liberty in Christ End Times (Eschatology) End Times: The Rapture Global Conspiracy (and Freemasonry) Calvinism and Free Will (Arminianism) Once Saved Always Saved Preterism Baptisms The Trinity Science, the Bible, and Creation Premillennialism Hebrew Roots & Sabbath Atheism vs. Theism Bible Translations Charismatic Doctrines Spiritual Warfare Roman Catholicism Why Christianity?

Things Which Must Shortly Come to Pass Preterism Part 1: The Basics and Partial Preterism Preterism Part 2: Olivet and the Transcendent "You" Preterism Part 3: The Remaining "Proof Texts" Preterism Part 4: Appealing to Josephus Preterism Part 5: Uninterrupted Futurism into 2nd Century Preterism Part 6: Nero, History, and Biblical Details Preterism Part 7: Scripture and a Delayed Coming Preterism Part 8: Brief Summary of Conclusions Behold I Come Quickly Things Which Must Shortly Come to Pass When Was Revelation Written? A Throne of His Own Preterists often find proof of their theory in Revelation. These two very parallel statements can be found in chapter 1 and chapter 22. Revelation 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John: Revelation 22:6 And he said unto me, These sayings are faithful and true: and the Lord God of the holy prophets sent his angel to shew unto his servants the things which must shortly be done. The Preterists focus on the phrase "things which must shortly be done." As we will soon show, there are two equally valid ways to interpret the key Greek word in this phrase. First, it can refer to something happening "soon" or, in other words, "in the very near future." Second, it can refer to the rate of speed at which an activity or series of events will be accomplished. Particularly of interest to the Preterists, is of course, the first option, that according to John, Jesus' return would be soon after he wrote the Revelation. Let's start by assuming this first definition is the case and see if that would force us to accept a Preterist point of view. In reality, these passages pose very little problem for Futurists. To illustrate, Futurist's might ask a simple question. "These things must shortly come to pass." From whose perspective? God's or man's? Peter has already told us in II Peter 3 that God does not count time as we count time. And Peter makes this statement concerning the supposed "slackness" of the Lord's coming. So it is particularly with the Lord's return in view that Peter comments on the difference between God's perception of "soon" and our perception of "soon" which appears to be causing the confusion. Also of note here is that Peter writes this comparison of how God reckons time as opposed to how we reckon time in the mid-60's AD. A Preterist interpretation of Revelation 1:1 and 22:6 that "shortly come to pass" meant the events described would happen just a few years after 65 AD does not seem to fit very easily with Peter's explanation in this second epistle. If we take into consideration Peter's words in this second epistle when examining these passages in Revelation 1 and 22, then a Futurist interpretation of the passages seems quite reasonable. In fact, the Futurist understanding would seem more reasonable than the Preterist interpretation, which would imply that Peter misunderstood Jesus' teachings on when Jesus' would return. (For more on 2 Peter 3 and Parousia Delay please visit are article entitled "Preterism Part 7: Scripture and a Delayed Coming, which is also in this section on Preterism.") In other words, disbelief over the Lord's slowness to return can be alleviated, according to Peter, once we understand that a short amount of time to God is much different than a short amount of time to men. For God, a thousand years are a short amount of time, just as short as a day or a watch in the night are to men. II Peter 3:4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. ...8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. 9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. Psalm 90:4 For a thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night. The origin of this quote that Peter uses here is in Psalms 90 (quoted above). In Psalms 90, a thousand years are compared to two things both of which are relatively short periods of time from a human perspective. A thousand years are said to pass by as quickly to God as 1. a day and 2. a watch in the night. The point of this statement is to demonstrate how quickly our time passes by to God. To this we would make only a slight but interesting speculation. Jesus himself in Luke 12 speaks of his return in terms of watches of the night. Luke 12:37 Blessed are those servants, whom the lord when he cometh shall find watching: verily I say unto you, that he shall gird himself, and make them to sit down to meat, and will come forth and serve them. 38 And if he shall come in the second watch, or come in the third watch, and find them so, blessed are those servants. 39 And this know, that if the goodman of the house had known what hour the thief would come, he would have watched, and not have suffered his house to be broken through. 40 Be ye therefore ready also: for the Son of man cometh at an hour when ye think not. In this parable, Jesus compares his return to an occurrence that happens late in the evening watches, possibly even as late as the second or even the third watch of the night. Hypothetically, this could be a further hint from Christ himself that his return would be somewhere around the turn of the 2nd and 3rd millennia after his first coming. To arrive at such an understanding of this passage we only have to assume one thing, that Christ was well aware of Psalm 90 when he made this statement. Even the parable of the good Samaritan provides evidence of this timeframe. Luke 10:33 But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him, 34 And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him. 35 And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence [1220], and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee. The word for "pence" is the Greek word denarion (Strong's #1220). It also occurs in Matthew 20:2-13 where Jesus says it is a day's wage. The definition of this word also indicates it was a standard day's wage. 1220 denarion {day-nar'-ee-on} of Latin origin;; n n AV - penny 9, pence 5, pennyworth 2; 16 denarius = "containing ten" 1) A Roman silver coin in NT time. It took its name from it being equal to ten "asses", a number after 217 B.C. increased to sixteen (about 3.898 grams or .1375 oz.). It was the principal silver coin of the Roman empire. From the parable of the labourers in the vineyard, it would seem that a denarius was then the ordinary pay for a day's wages. (Mt. 20:2-13) Matthew 20:2 And when he had agreed with the labourers for a penny a day, he sent them into his vineyard. ...9 And when they came that were hired about the eleventh hour, they received every man a penny. Even in the Good Samaritan parable, Jesus indicates that the Samaritan pays the innkeeper two pence, which would have been two denarion, or two day's wages. So, according to Jesus, the Samaritan would return after two days. Although this is still speculation, there two things of interest here. First, according to Psalm 90, two days would have been the equivalent of 2 thousand year periods. Second, this is remarkably consistent with Jesus comparison to the watches of the night. With regard to the watches of the night, Jesus says the thief might come in the second or perhaps even the third watch. In the parable of the Good Samaritan, Jesus says the Samaritan gives the innkeeper enough for two days but states that there may be some extra time beyond those two days. Both parables could indicate Jesus' return somewhere between the turn of the second and third millennia after his first coming. In addition, this would also explain why the writers of the New Testament often refer to being in the last days. Perhaps, they were are aware of Psalm 90, that for God a thousand years pass as quickly as a day passes for men. In the context of the understanding, being in the last days could easily refer to the last 2000 years. Regardless of whether or not the parables in Luke 10 and 12 include symbolic references to the timeframe of Christ's return, Peter's words in II Peter 3 are proof that the apostolic Church leadership did, in fact, understand Psalm 90 applied to the timeframe of the second coming. So, Revelation 1:1 and 22:6 do not pose a problem for Futurists even if we interpret the key Greek word to refer to the "soon-ness" of certain events. Futurists simply understand that this is from the point of view of God in whose eyes a thousand years are as quick to pass as a day or a watch of the night. And Futurists understand that this would not be deceptive or misleading on the part of God, since Peter's words in II Peter 3 demonstrate that the leadership of the Church at that time did understand the use of this symbolism. The second definition for the key Greek word in these two verses is even less problematic for Futurists. That is to say, if the key Greek word does not refer to the "soon-ness" of these events, but instead refers to the rate at which these events must occur, then the Preterists' "proof" disappears entirely. Let's first define the key Greek word in these two parallel verses. The critical word is the English word "shortly" which in the Greek is the compound word/phrase "en tachos" (Strong's 5034). It is defined as follows. 5034 tachos takh'-os from the same as 5036; ; n n AV-shortly + 1722 4, quickly + 1722 2, speedily + 1722 1; 7 1) quickness, speed En tachos is part of a family of Greek words derived from the root word "tachus." 5036 tachus takh-oos' of uncertain affinity; ; adj AV-swift 1; 1 1) quick, fleet, speedy All the words in this family can be translated to refer to the "soon-ness" of an activity or the rate at which activities will occur. Here are some examples. Luke 16:6 And he said, An hundred measures of oil. And he said unto him, Take thy bill, and sit down quickly [5030], and write fifty. 1 Timothy 5:22 Lay hands suddenly [5030] on no man, neither be partaker of other men's sins: keep thyself pure. 5030 tacheos takh-eh'-oce from 5036; ; adv AV-shortly 4, quickly 2, soon 2, hastily 1, suddenly 1; 10 1) quickly, shortly John 13:27 And after the sop Satan entered into him. Then said Jesus unto him, That thou doest, do quickly [5032]. 5032 tachion takh'-ee-on neuter singular of the comparative of 5036 (as adverb); ; adv AV-shortly 2, quickly 1, outrun + 4390 1, the sooner 1; 5 1) more swiftly, more quickly John 11:29 As soon as she heard, she arose quickly [5035], and came unto him. 5035 tachu takh-oo' neuter singular of 5036 (as adverb); ; adv AV-quickly 12, lightly 1; 13 1) quickly, speedily (without delay) In both Luke and Acts we find the exact parallel of the same Greek phrase en tachos. And we see in these cases that it has implications for either "soon" or speed. Luke 18:8 I tell you that he will avenge them speedily [5034][1722]. Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth? Acts 22:18 And saw him saying unto me, Make haste, and get thee quickly [1722] [5034] out of Jerusalem: for they will not receive thy testimony concerning me. But why would the Holy Spirit being telling us that these events will occur at a quick rate? There are ample Biblical reasons to assume this understanding. From the end time prophecies of Daniel, we see that the events of the end times take place within a very short duration of time, with the great tribulation spanning only 3 1/2 years. Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, when he held up his right hand and his left hand unto heaven, and sware by him that liveth for ever that it shall be for a time, times, and an half; and when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished. ...11 And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days. 12 Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days. And Revelation echoes this exact duration in at least two places. Revelation 11:2 But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months. Revelation 12:14 And to the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent. Jesus himself tells us the significance of these things happening over a short duration of time as opposed to a long period of time. Matthew 24:22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened. Mark 13:20 And except that the Lord had shortened those days, no flesh should be saved: but for the elect's sake, whom he hath chosen, he hath shortened the days. If the events of the end times are not shortened, if they do not take place quickly over a short duration of time, then no flesh would survive. This would include the elect. So, in order to ensure that some of the elect would survive this period of tribulation and not taste death as prophesied by Paul in I Corinthians 15, God has allowed only the relatively short span of 3 1/2 years for these events to occur. And Revelation echoes this concept as well. We note that in the first of the following passages the antichrist is said to continue for only a short space of time. The word for "short space" in the Greek is defined as follows. It refers to a short duration of time. Unlike, en tachos, it cannot be interpreted "soon." 3641 oligos ol-ee'-gos of uncertain affinity; TDNT-5:171,682; adj AV-few 14, (a) little 7, small 5, few things 4, almost + 1722 2, a while 2, misc 9; 43 1) little, small, few 1a) of number: multitude, quantity, or size 1b) of time: short 1c) of degree or intensity: light, slight Revelation 17:10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space <3641>. Revelation 12:12 Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time. 13 And when the dragon saw that he was cast unto the earth, he persecuted the woman which brought forth the man child. 14 And to the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent. In this second passage from Revelation 12, the short time the devil has not only parallels the short space in which the antichrist will reign, but it is equated directly to the 3 1/2 years that the woman is protected from his wrath. So, to interpret Revelation 1:1 and 22:6 as the rate in which these events must take place, fits perfectly with existing statements made by Christ in Matthew and Mark. It also fits perfectly with descriptions of the end time events found in both Daniel and Revelation where we are told that the great tribulation will last only 3 1/2 years. And Jesus himself indicates why he would give this information to us. When describing in detail the difficulties and tribulation that is coming upon the earth, it would be of great comfort to God's people to know that these events will span only a short duration of time and that these events will therefore unfold at a very quick rate. God's people will have to endure much in those days but they will not have to endure it for an excessive amount of time. God will be true to his promise in I Thessalonians 4 and I Corinthians 15. Some of his elect will survive and will not taste death. So, we see that the Greek phrase found in Revelation 1 and 22 can either refer to the "soon-ness" of an event, or it can refer to the rate and duration of a series of events. Neither of these two definitions poses a significant problem for Futurists. These verses are therefore not Preterist proof texts. Back to the top. Home | Just So You Know | About Us | A Brief Word On | In-Depth Studies