 |

Home
Church Community
Statement of
Beliefs
Contact Us Search Our Site
Bible
Study Resource
|
 |
 |

Particulars
of Christianity:
310
Pentecostalism, the Charismatic
and Faith Movements
Specific
Doctrines of the Charismatic Movement
and Faith Movement
Specific
Doctrines of the Charismatic Movement/Faith Movement
Kenotic Theology
The Anointing and Being Under
Authority (Part 1)
The Anointing and Being Under
Authority (Part 2)
Sickness and Healing (Part 1)
Sickness and Healing (Part 2)
Prayer, Asking and Receiving
(Part 1)
Prayer, Asking and Receiving
(Part 2)
Christians and Material Wealth
(Part 1)
Christians and Material Wealth
(Part 2)
Christians and Material Wealth
(Part 3)
The "Rhema" and "Logos" Word
(Part 1)
The "Rhema" and "Logos" Word
(Part 2)
Section 1 | Section
2 | Section 3 | Section
4
| Section 5
The
term Kenotic Theology is derived from the Greek words "kenos"
(Strong's No. 2756) and "kenoo," (Strong's No. 2758) which
mean, "to empty." The critical occurrence of "kenoo" as far
as this doctrine is concerned, occurs in Philippians 2.
The main premise of Kenotic doctrine is that Jesus Christ
was God before he came to earth and resumed his divinity after
his ascension, but just prior to the incarnation He "emptied"
himself of divine properties so that he was only a man, and
not God, during his 33 years here on earth.
Here is the key text from Philippians 2.
Philippians 2:5 Let this mind be in you, which was
also in Christ Jesus: 6 Who, being in the form of
God, thought it not robbery [725] to be equal with
God: 7 But made himself of no reputation [2759], and
took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the
likeness of men: 8 And being found in fashion as a man, he
humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even
the death of the cross. 9 Wherefore God also hath highly
exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name:
10 That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow,
of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under
the earth; 11 And that every tongue should confess that
Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
First, as usual, there is some simple vocabulary that needs
to be done. The word for "robbery" in verse 6 is the Greek
word "harpagmos" (Strong's No. 725.) Harpagmos is used as
a noun here and in this passage it refers to "a thing seized
or to be seized, booty to deem anything a prize, a thing to
be seized upon or to be held fast, retained." So, for the
sake of clarification, verse 6 is simply stating that Jesus
did not consider his equality with God something to prize
or cling too. This is not an issue with Kenotic Theology.
Those who hold to Kenotic Theology agree with this much.
As we stated above, the word translated into the English phrase
"made himself of no reputation" is the Greek word "kenoo,"
(Strong's No. 2758), which means "to empty."
Now, according to Kenotics this means that Jesus emptied himself
of divine properties. Kenotics also distinguish between "divine
properties" such as omniscience, omnipresence, and omnipotence
and "divine character attributes" such as holiness, love,
mercy, benevolence, etc. They make this distinction for a
reason. In short, Kenotics interpret from verse 7 that Jesus
Christ emptied himself of divine properties but not the divine
character attributes. But it should be noted that the Kenotics
define what is divine strictly in terms of the divine properties.
Or in other words, when Jesus emptied himself of omnipotence,
omniscience, and omnipresence, etc. he ceased being God even
though he retained the character attributes that God possesses.
So, for Kenoticists, it is the divine properties that constitute
the divine nature.
And that distinction in and of itself is not a problem theologically.
Nor does that distinction necessarily logically lead to the
Kenotics conclusions. It's where the Kenotics go from that
point forward that is the problem.
The problem is threefold for Kenotic Theology. First, Kenotic
theology contradicts its own proof text. Kenotics take the
word "kenoo" to indicate that Jesus Christ literally emptied
himself. Therefore, they conclude he was not God while he
was here on earth for 33 years. However, Kenotics also believe
that Jesus Christ retained the character attributes of God
despite this emptying that occurred. Thus, even for Kenotics,
emptied doesn't mean entirely emptied, for even the Kenotics
believe that Jesus did not empty himself of the divine character
attributes. And by allowing Jesus to retain some of his former
qualities despite this emptying, Kenotics are actually acknowledging
that the emptying does not require the loss of qualities.
Therefore, since qualities can be maintained through the emptying
process, there is no need to assert that this verse requires
that Jesus Christ gave up any qualities at all, including
the "divine properties."
In short, the very way in which Kenotics themselves interpret
this passage contradicts the doctrine they derive from it.
Therefore, Kenoticism is self-contradicting and should be
rejected.
Second, the context of this passage actually tells us specifically
what it was that Jesus emptied himself of. Starting with verse
6, we find that Jesus Christ (who before his incarnation was
known as the Word) is equal with God. Or in other words, he
is not subordinate to anyone, not even God. He was equal and
supreme over all things. But verse 6 continues by telling
us that he did not consider this supremacy something to cling
to. Instead of clinging to this supremacy, verse 7 tells us
that Jesus Christ emptied himself of that supremacy, that
is, his divine rank and authority. Jesus Christ did not empty
himself of divinity in any way. Rather, he emptied himself
of his rank and authority as the Supreme Being and took on
the role of a subordinate, a servant as verse 7 plainly tells
us.
Clearly what Jesus Christ gave up was supreme authority in
order to live as a subordinate. In verse 8, he continues to
be humbled, subordinating himself to God the Father even so
far as to obey him and give up his life. Truly the Supreme
being of the Word was nullifying his own supreme authority
by subordinating himself in this way.
And verse 9-11 tell us the conclusion. Having emptied himself
of his supreme authority in which he was subordinate to none,
God the Father then restored to him this supreme authority
once his mission was complete. Once he subordinated himself
to the point of death, God gave back to Jesus Christ all the
authority he had emptied himself of. He emptied himself of
his kingly rights and authority and lived as a servant. Then
God gave him back his kingly authority so that every knee
would bow and every tongue confess his supremely sovereign
name.
This is not a story of Jesus Christ giving up divine properties
or attributes or divinity in general. It's a simple statement
about Jesus Christ giving up his sovereign supreme authority
by living in submission as a humble, lowly servant. There
is no reason to interpret this passage the way that Kenotics
do. The only way to end up with the Kenotics' conclusion is
to start out with that idea already and read it into the text,
which on its own would not warrant such a conclusion apart
from pre-existing biases.
Third, Kenotic teaching is in direct contrast with orthodox
Christian teaching handed down by the Apostles. As such, it
is a heresy and should be rejected as such.
But, of course, many readers will realize that they've probably
never heard Kenotic Theology taught in Faith Movement Churches.
And that's true. This idea is not named, nor directly stated
in the Faith Movement. However, this doctrine is believed
knowingly by some pastors and probably indirectly by others.
That's how we came to believe it for a time before rejecting
it as the heresy it is.
In reality, Kenotic theology is necessary in one form or another
by the Faith Movement doctrine regarding how the atonement
works. In short, Faith Movement teachers generally believe
teach that Jesus' death on the cross was not sufficient to
atone for and redeem mankind. They maintain that he also had
to suffer torment in hell. But, most significantly, they also
demand that Jesus had to suffer spiritual death, which is
defined as separation from God.
Now, spiritual death truly is separation from God and all
unredeemed mankind suffers this fate because of sin. But,
Jesus himself did not suffer it. The problem is a misunderstanding
of how the atonement works. (For more on this see our article
series on the Redemption.) In short, in order for Jesus to
endure spiritual death, he would have to be separated from
God. But Jesus could not be separated from God so long as
he is God. Therefore, it is necessary to explain how Jesus
was not God for a time. And this is where Kenotic Theology
fits in because it misinterprets Philippians 2:7 as a basis
for teaching that Jesus ceased to be God for some time. Thus,
it becomes possible for Jesus to die spiritually as the Faith
Movement teachers believe and teach.
And, the real novelty of Kenotic Theology is that by stating
that Jesus emptied himself of divinity, Faith Movement teachers
can still say with confidence that Jesus was eternally God
prior to the incarnation. This is essential because it allows
them to appear orthodox even though they are speaking outright
heresy. Through this subtlety, because most Christians do
not consider the implications of such ideas, Faith Movement
teachers can attract large numbers of Christians from all
denominations even though their teaching necessitates heretical
doctrines.
There is one additional heretical implication of Kenotic Theology
on the orthodox, Christian view of God that we might also
mention. Kenotic Theology's assertion that Jesus emptied himself
of his divine properties and ceased to be God for his 33 years
on earth has profound implications on the Trinity. If Jesus
was not, by nature, God for his life on earth, then during
that same period of time, God was a duality and NOT a Trinity.
This is because, without Jesus remaining God for those 33
years, the godhead would only have been comprised of two persons,
God the Father and the Holy Spirit. Of course, such a suggestion
is heresy, since it is contrary to both scripture and orthodox,
church history.
In closing, the following Faith Movement teachers have taught
on the record that Jesus Christ died spiritual, which necessitates
that Jesus must cease being God at least for a time. Once
again, the page number behind each quote below denotes the
page number on which it can be found in Hank Hanegraaff's
book Christianity in Crisis, published by Harvest House
Publishers, Inc. July 1997, 590 pages. Behind the page number
is the publication or tape where the original statement was
made.
Frederick K.C. Price: "Do you think that the punishment
for our sin was to die on a cross? If that were the case,
the two thieves could have paid your price. No, the punishment
was to go into hell itself and to serve time in hell separated
from God." - Page 383, Ever Increasing Faith Messenger
[June 1980], 7.
Charles Capps: "The sinless son of God became as a
serpent that He might swallow up all evil...If you will behold
what happened when the sin offering was made and the fact
that Jesus became a serpent upon a pole, it will change your
life...Jesus died spiritually, not for any of His own sin?
He became the serpent on the pole, the snake on the ground,
in the Old Testament type." - Page 383, Authority in Three
Worlds, 177, 166-67.
Kenneth Copeland: "That Word of the living God went
down into that pit of destruction and charged the spirit of
Jesus with resurrection power! Suddenly His twisted, death-wracked
spirit began to fill out and come back to life. He began to
look like something the devil had never seen before." - Page
383, "The Price of it All," Believer's Voice of Victory
19, 9 [September 1991]:4.
Kenneth Copeland: "What [why] does God have to pay
the price for this thing? He has to have a man that is like
that first one. It's got to be a man. He's got to be all man.
He cannot be a God and come storming in here with attributes
and dignities that are not common to man. He can't do that.
It's not legal." - Page 138-139, 394, "The Incarnation" (Fort
Worth, TX: Kenneth Copeland Ministries, 1985), audiotape #010402,
side 1, emphasis in original.
Kenneth Hagin: "[s]piritual death means something more
than separation from God. Spiritual death also means having
Satan's nature...Jesus tasted death-spiritual death-for
every man." - Page 156, 395, Kenneth E. Hagin, The Name
of Jesus (Tulsa, OK: Kenneth Hagin Ministries, 1981),
31, emphasis in original.
Frederick K.C. Price: "Somewhere between the time He
[Jesus] was nailed to the cross and when He was in the Garden
of Gethsemane-somewhere in there-He died spiritually. Personally,
I believe it was while He was in the garden." - Page 157,
395, "Identification #3" (Inglewood, CA: Ever Increasing Faith
Ministries, 1980), tape #FP545, side 1.
Kenneth Copeland "The righteousness of God was made
to be sin. He accepted the sin nature of Satan in His own
spirit. And at the moment that He did so, He cried, 'My God,
My God, why hast thou forsaken Me?' You don't know what happened
at the cross. Why do you think that Moses, upon instruction
of God, raised the serpent upon that pole instead of a lamb?
That used to bug me. I said, 'Why in the world would you want
to put a snake up there-the sign of Satan? Why didn't you
put a lamb on that pole?' And the Lord said, 'Because it was
a sign of Satan that was hanging on the cross.' He said, 'I
accepted, in My own spirit, spiritual death; and the light
was turned off.'" - Page 158, 395, "What Happened from the
Cross to the Throne" (Fort Worth, TX: Kenneth Copeland Ministries,
1990), audiotape #02-0017, side 2.
Kenneth Hagin: "He [Jesus] tasted spiritual death for
every man. And His spirit and inner man went to hell in my
place. Can't you see that? Physical death wouldn't remove
your sins. He's tasted death for every man. He's talking about
tasting spiritual death." - Page 164, 396 "How Jesus Obtained
His Name" (Tulsa, OK: Kenneth Hagin Ministries, n.d.), tape
#44H01, side 1.
Kenneth Hagin: "Jesus died as our Substitute. He who
knew no sin was made to be sin. He took upon Himself our sin
nature. And He died-He was separated and cut off from God.
He went down into the prison house of suffering in our place.
He was there three day and nights." - Page 396, "Made Alive,"
The Word of Faith 15, 4 (April 1982):3.
Benny Hinn: "My, you know, whoosh! The Holy Ghost is
just showing me some stuff. I'm getting dizzy! I'm telling
you the truth-it's, it's just heavy right now on me...He's
[referring to Jesus] in the underworld now. God isn't there,
the Holy Ghost inst' there, and the Bible says he was begotten.
Do you know what the word begotten means? It means reborn.
Do you want another shocker? Have you been begotten? So was
He. Don't let anyone deceive you. Jesus was reborn. You say,
'What are you talking about?'...He was reborn. He had to be
reborn...If He was not reborn, I could not be reborn. Jesus
was born again...If He was not reborn, I would never be reborn."
- Page 173, 397, Benny Hinn, "Our Position 'In Christ,' Part
1" (Orlando, FL: Orlando Christian Center, 1991), videotape
#TV-254.
|
 |
|
 |

|
 |